Ufologists 1964 Barnesville Minnesotufo Landing
Primeval on the day of May 5, 1964, flower pot Alfred Ernst, of Barnesville, Minnesota, gang his truck up to his grit control. He got out and began loading the control for the continued wheat seeding of his land, which had begun the day in advance. He idle for a be with and surveyed the obsolete plain that was his farm, about six miles east of Comstock. Next, at 8 a.m., he saw a UFO on the ground.

"It was a gleaming egg-shaped object approximately 1,500 feet obtainable," the older Barnesville Mayor told Norman Put in, NICAP Minnesota Subcommittee connect. "It appeared to be about three to four feet desire and border on as widespread."

The greatest, in a gone cry out dialect amid Dr. James E. McDonald, meant the object was "dearest the tub of a washing symbol, round-bottomed." Submit was a multihued create to it and it was "not easy to the way you are seen at."

Ernst saw the object as it was despoil off. It rose in a hurry and deceased inwards the clouds in five seconds. The greatest meant he felt "fairly bouncy" at the same time as the UFO deceased.

The flower pot subsequently gang to the farm of his brother, Leo A. Ernst, and the two men returned to the landing site. Submit they bare a crater-like depreciation about three feet in diameter. At the center of this depreciation was a disregard about three or four inches in diameter. Four other holes approximately one and one-half inches in diameter and two feet in the sticks produced a total in the region of the central disregard. The depressed area was strangely dry.

Sharply the rim of the depreciation a wan power, gone analyzed as alkaline, was found. Ernst meant the black muddy in that area did not restriction alkaline.

WDAY-TV, of Fargo, North Dakota, took an uncharacteristic interest in the report and sent a man to plot and describe photographs of the area. The have a fight of this investigation were made nationwide on Dewey Berquist's weather program.

"The holes are clear-cut the type I've seen numerous era and I'm sure they were caused by lightning," Berquist wrote NICAP. "I engage Mr. Ernst saw an uncommon phenomena called ball or sphere lightning."

BULL LIGHTNING Guess DISPUTED


The greatest himself does not hesitate. Nor does Dr. McDonald.

"Having the status of I was quizzing [Ernst] about the state of the weather," Dr. McDonald meant in a report to NICAP, "he made mention to the ball lightning explanation and meant that was exactly so mysterious. He sharp out that he and his create and grandfather had farmed in that area (his grandfather homesteaded impart) and not any in the area had habitually seen any fireball or ball lightning or anything dearest that in advance.... Having heard point from Ernst his account of the very susceptible representation of the holes, which distinctly impressed him distinctly, and additive that to his account of the weather, I would say that any type of ball lightning audacity wish not fit the report. I would say that this is a plaza strong case."

The Arizona atmospheric physicist meant gale activity is needed to ignite ball lightning, but "impart is no inflate of any gale going on at the time, nor does any of the theme contemplate lightning activity."

"The descriptions of the mathematical representation of holes in the blown-out area are exactly so occasional of ball lightning....," Dr. McDonald continued. "Ernst mentioned that it was not easy to the way you are seen at the object due to its intelligence. I hold never heard of ball lightning so radiant that it would be not easy to the way you are seen at at a estrange of a area of a mile....

"It is legitimate that lightning sometimes makes a disregard or opening in the ground and it is moreover legitimate that at the same time as it hits sand it vitrefies the sand, but I would not be pleased amid Berquist's laid-back explanation of the holes on such a source, in position of the reported mathematical representation....

"Pill lightning plaza regularly locks of hair by setting off (unevenly amid rancid force, customarily point amid a loud commotion). One strength expect that the disregard which Ernst reported was due to innate veneer of a lightning ball; even now, subsequently one would be missing high and dry amid respect to accounting for the pitch of the radiant weight. If, strangely, one argued that the disregard was made by an standard cloud-to-ground knot which subsequently generated a lightning ball, it would be mysterious to construe that Ernst may possibly hold failed to stick a very loud crash of roar. No inflate of any such roar is made." - "NICAP - eccentric Belongings from UFOs' - Donald Keyhoe and Gordon Lore"