For some perverse reason, I found myself once again lurking on the JREF message board in the surreal and "looooooooooooooooonnnngggg" (oh, so very long) thread CALLING ALL SKEPTICS! HELP KITAKAZE END PGF CONTROVERSY - PITCH TO DISCOVERY CHANNEL. As usual, I was struck by the bizarre and pathological - obsession of skeptics and debunkers to discuss, mock, and argue the non-existence of Sasquatch. And in particular, as on the above mentioned thread, the Patterson-Gimlin footage. "Kitakaze," as we know, has been on that hobby horse for some time; his crusade has been, well, interesting, as well as unnerving. (For example, see MELISSA HOVEY'S COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ON HER BLOG THE SEARCH FOR BIGFOOT.)So, reading the last couple of pages in this thread, the sheer number of which boggles the mind -- it's what, around elevenity-million or something -- I had the idle thought that it doesn't matter if the P-G footage is a hoax or not, because, because, "because:" people have seen Bigfoot! Very simple.Of course it does matter if the P-G film is of a real Sasquatch; my point is, in the great scheme of things, proving the P-G film is a hoax doesn't prove at all that Bigfoot does not "not" exist.MY QUESTION (RHETORICAL; PLEASE, IF YOU'RE A SKEPTOID DO NOT ATTEMPT TO ENGAGE) IS: IF IT'S PROVEN THE P-G FILM IS A HOAX, WILL THE DISCUSSION OF BIGFOOT'S EXISTENCE END FOR YOU ALL? I DOUBT IT; LOOK AT HOW MANY THREADS ON THE JREF THERE ARE ABOUT BIGFOOT. A FEW "DOZEN," EASILY. NOT THE FIRST TIME I'VE ASKED THIS BUT I AM INTRIGUED: WHY SPEND SO MUCH TIME ON SOMETHING YOU BELIEVE DOESN'T EXIST? THAT YOU BELIEVE "COULDN'T POSSIBLY EXIST," DESPITE THE NUMBER OF WITNESS ACCOUNTS?
Reference: ovni-news.blogspot.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment