Welcome! "Alien Life" tracks the latest discoveries and thoughts in the various elements of the famous Drake Equation. You may notice that this and future entries are shorter than usual; career, family and book deal commitments have forced me to cut back some of my projects. Now, here's today's news:
g ABODES - Astronomers have found complex organic molecules in a disk of red dust surrounding a distant star. The star is in the late stages of planet formation, suggesting that the basic building blocks of life may be common in planetary systems. See article.
g LIFE - Quote of the Day: "We may pronounce each orb sustains a race/Of living things adapted to the place." - Richard Blackmore, "In Creation: A Philosophical Poem in Seven Books"
g MESSAGE - With the discovery of the potentially habitable planet Gliese 581 c, astrobiologists are setting their sights on the search for extraterrestrial life. Where are the best places to look? What are the best instruments to perform those searches? How will they do it? See article. Note: This article is from 2007.
g AFTERMATH - Will we ever find a primer for decoding messages from extraterrestrials? Last month, anthropologists who gathered for a major conference in Atlanta heard some news that will be sobering for SETI enthusiasts: it may be much more difficult to understand extraterrestrials than many scientists have thought before. See article.
Spanking UFO SIGHTINGS - This photos were taken in France in July 2010 and submitted to our site.View report: "I grasp various photo when a muscle case of ufo sighting:"(My camera is a Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ18.)"In 2009, i hit various picture of sunset :"- the first (P1070109.JPG) is a sunset : you can see various precise about the sun and equally you stain it seems for instance stars but i don t footing it s stars and constellations but with conviction satelitte or probably ufo ?""In july, 2010 11th: i ended deferment to a high-profile fort in France (town of Meillant)"- the take notes (P1110893.JPG) is placed contemporary a fort in France (fort of Meillant) and at the award present-day is a special footing for instance a rod (not a plane and not a bird) equally you stain on it, it s right end as a ufo orbit i ever see."- the third (P110860.JPG) i hit this photo and i play that i grasp an orb and at the award of orb (when sun reflexion ?) but at award i grasp a spheric object (in stain).. I don't convey if it is right ufo but it is right "strange" !"Author: Sylvainsource: submitted to www.Latest-UFO-Sightings.netClick ON THE PHOTOS.
When is a UFO still a UFO?A headline for a story from the Norway Post proclaimed, "Norwegian UFO-mystery solved? Norwegian scientists now believe they are nearing a solution to the Hessdalen UFO-mystery which has puzzled experts for more than 25 years."OK, I have to give the writer of the story an extra bonus point for inclusion of the question mark. That should have been the first clue that a mystery that 'might be solved' hasn't really been solved at all.The story explains, "The so-called Hessdalen lights have been seen ever since the 1940's and have since 1984 been monitored by volunteers." OK, that's vaguely interesting. Apparently balls of light have been observed that might be reminiscent of the so-called "Foo Fighter UFOs" seen by pilots during WWII.After much observation, are the scientists studying the phenomena ready to announce the solution to the mystery?Apparently not:"According to the scientists, it is now clear that the phenomen is not UFO-related, but are luminous balls containing some form of energy... We have pictures which show the optical spectre, and can therefore determine which elements they are made of," says researcher Erling Strand of the Oestfold College. However, he says much work remains before he is ready to give the final answer."Regardless of the elements they are made of, aren't unexplained flying objects that present themselves as mysterious luminous balls of energy still UFOs?
Reference: aliens-are-friends.blogspot.com
SOUTH AFRICA'S Principal UFO Parley UNDERWAY
Surprised Minds being indulged in Jo'burg
Parley attendees to South Africa's first Ordinary On high Matter (UFOs) conference despoil unyielding in Johannesburg this weekend said it option compress a cranny that has been empty way too want.
The conference began on Friday dawn and involved close down fawn as well as individuals merrily questioning to interconnect in topics that they fix not heard candidly discussed in South Africa in a conference hardheaded.
Delegates included individuals that fix seen UFOs and others that fix seen what can best be described as extraterrestrials. Particular attended to ensnare out if impart was any stake of UFO disclosure, several weigh up that impart has been a truth ruling out in unyielding (clearly by the U.S. govt) for treat than sixty natural life.
By all accounts the conference had a very accepted gut reaction and individuals in authority established that this conference was a want time in the invention. South Africa has treat for that reason its frothy amount of droll minds and kin who fix encountered mysterious anomalies over the natural life.
The UFO conference began in the manner of a appealing talk about bio-mimicry, that great combination of letters and technology.
This was speedily followed by a opening on initiative orbs and mysterious half-man half-animal beings from the fifth dimension.
Although, that was docile proficient compared to what individual of the presenters fix set out to show.
Meanwhile, the conference option run until Sunday and is a public holiday for a person in the manner of a droll essence that requirements to be moved, indulged or or get answers that you won't ensnare in the media.
South Africa, UFO, UFO Parley, Aliens, Surprised Minds
Credit: outer-space-guests.blogspot.com
SHORT UFO FACT: [Modern era of the study of UFOs is usually believed to be the 1947 sighting report of nine "FLYING SAUCERS" made by pilot Kenneth Arnold on June 24, 1947. Arnold was aiding in the search for a missing plane when the sighting occurred. He did not believe his story would be believed, but swore that it was true. Arnold related his sighting to the Chicago Daily Tribune: "The first thing I noticed was a series of flashes in my eyes as if a mirror was reflecting sunlight at me..."]2012 JUDGMENT DAY AND THE MARSEARTH CONNECTION 1 OF 8 SHORT UFO FACT: [In 1946, General James H. Doolittle was sent to Sweden by the Shell Oil Company, supposedly to investigate the mystery of the "GHOST ROCKETS." Why an oil company would investigate UFOs is beyond my understanding. Unless they felt they could strengthen their profits somehow. Somehow, he supposedly wound up in Spitzbergen. There are a number of Internet sites which claim that there was a short lived article published in America of a UFO crash in the Norwegian city about this time. Some people claim to have seen the article. The really odd thing about the tale of this case is the question must be asked what does Doolittle have to do with anything, since he is only mentioned as being in the area, and that is the end of his involvement. ]REAL UFO SIGHT AND FILMEDIF THESE EVIDENCES ARE ENOUGH FOR YOU, THEN RATE THIS PAGE:>>> You're still not sure? Get the documentary proof here
THE BITTER TRUTH IS, I WISH my research into the motion picture had been far more comprehensive. For my first article, published in Official UFO, I faced a deadline. Far worse, I had no expense account and when all was said and done I was only paid a few hundred dollars, so to depict my research as a labor of love would be accurate. I couldn't fly about the country seeking out principal movie associates and, quite honestly, the long distance phone bills racked up in the mid-seventies as I attempted to find people and information took a toll in themselves. Yes, for the first article I would certainly have preferred additional interviews with such key personnel as screenwriter Francis Martin and director Winston Jones, and I'm sure everybody from the camera crew to the set decorators would have fascinating anecdotes to pass along. I tried to locate radar expert Wendell Swanson and inquired of such sources as the "new" NICAP about where I could find UFO photographers Newhouse and Mariana -- with no success. Unfortunately, the initial article, printed more than 30 years ago, must stand on its own merits now. As I write this blog entry in June of 2008, I'm also more than aware that pretty much all of the major folks involved with 1956's "U.F.O." are dead now. Even Al Chop, who, like Tom Towers, always seemed somehow immortal to me, passed away a couple of years ago. On a brighter note, in the weeks ahead I'll post numerous letters from the likes of Chop, Towers, Dewey Fournet and Willis Sperry, for written communication sent back and forth via "snail mail" was the method I used -- the method I had to use -- three decades ago. Looking back, I'm grateful for the written words of one and all, for this is crucial history interpreted in their very words, not just some pile of notes I jotted down in my own handwriting. Yes, much of this information appears in my magazine and journal articles of the past, but I think you'll agree that one's ability to examine the original source -- the letters themselves -- takes everything to a higher level of documentation. Yet, I would never have searched for any of these gentlemen, were it not for motion picture producer Clarence Greene's little effort entitled "U.F.O." Already established in the industry with his partner Russell Rouse in Greene-Rouse Productions, Greene was somebody I obviously needed to contact. Nevertheless, while actually thrilled that he responded to my letter and questions in January of 1976, I was profoundly disappointed that he provided little more than one-word or single-sentence answers. I've posted his letter, but the questions to which Greene offers answers are as follows:1. I asked him if I could extract and use any information from press kit materials (a redundant question, since they were already for public distribution) regarding the movie, and that was acceptable to him. 2. There was further confirmation about using other visuals from the movie, and again he harbored no objections. 3. This is his response to my request for a list of his recent films. 4. I asked about his own UFO sighting, and received precious little information. He probably assumed I could obtain details from the press kit. 5. This was an attempt to establish a time frame when "U.F.O." was started and finished. I still tend to believe, however, that the whole procedure from research to end of filming required something closer to 2 1/2, if not three years. 6. A brief, funny, response! I asked Greene about the costs involved, losses at the box office and "Is it possible that the country wasn't ready for the documentary-form motion picture in 1956?" He quips that "It is possible but the audience wasn't ready." 7. I hoped to get more insight on Greene's use of numerous Los Angeles Sheriffs Dept. personnel as extras in the film. His response about their "experience with UFOs" certainly could have led to other questions -- though the chance that he would have replied in detail was slim, indeed. 8. How would "U.F.O." do at the box office, were it released in 1975 instead of 1956, I pondered. Okay, bad question, predictable answer. 9. Did Greene consider making a "part 2" after the first movie? No. 10. I wondered about problems encountered in obtaining prints of the Utah and Montana UFO films, and Greene assures me that there were none. 11. Greene likewise responds negatively about difficulties with official government opposition or interference. 12. Greene offers no response when I ask about interesting anecdotes during filming. 13. Again, he skips a question. I had asked about anything he might have changed regarding "U.F.O." 14. Here, Greene confirms that actor Harry Morgan provided the voice of a pilot during the segment about the Washington, D.C. UFOs. Nowadays, you can find this information on the Internet in two seconds. Back in the seventies, not so quickly. 15. Considering how public interest in UFOs has become more heightened and sophisticated over the years, would you ever consider making another UFO film documentary? "Possibly," Greene replies, honoring me with the word chosen to close out my earliest magazine article. I listed five more questions, but producer Greene quit after no. 15 above. Fortunately, Clarence Greene appeared far more verbose years earlier. In 1967, he stepped forward with a detailed explanation of why he made the movie. I'm posting his statement below, but I regret that I don't know where it appeared originally. Some quotes from this piece have been attributed to me, but I had nothing to do with the following account, so if any of my readers know its origin I'll be happy to add a credit. In the meantime, here's producer Greene's 1967 statement: (Note -- I found this some time ago on the Internet, uncredited, and I have taken the liberty to correct the spelling on a few words, as I'm not sure if Greene originally made these errors, or if somebody made errors in posting his comments.) "UFO: WHY I MADE "UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS," BY CLARENCE GREENE -- JULY 26, 1967 I made "Unidentified Flying Objects" because of a simple, but most urgent belief: that the public should know the true facts about flying saucers. Although "Unidentified Flying Objects" didn't go into production until may of 1954, it could be said the picture had its conception on an August night in 1952. I was with a friend when the latter called my attention to a strange object in the sky. Although it was like nothing I had ever seen before, it had the shape and appearance of a sphere of light. We watched it for about five minutes, during which period it stopped, made various turns, then finally sped over the horizon.Later that night I learned that the strange flying object had also been observed by members of the Ground Observation Corps. The incident made an indelible impression on me, and the next morning I told my partner, Russell Rouse, and the members of the Greene and Rouse staff about it. All along I had been reading newspaper stories scoffing at reports of flying saucer sightings. Now, having seen one of the strange objects myself, I could understand how the sighters must have felt at being ridiculed. Later I was to learn that hundreds of other sightings had been made, with the sighters reluctant to mention it for fear of ridicule. I found myself becoming irritated at the scoffers. I was at a complete loss to understand why there seemed to be such a determined effort to suppress all news of Unidentified Flying Objects by what seemed to be a planned campaign of skepticism and scoffing. I decided to get to the bottom of the story. I learned that Albert M. Chop, who had been the Press Information Specialist for the Pentagon, handling all flying saucer news, was on the West Coast. I had several meetings with him. Chop was reluctant to talk at first. But when he realized I was dead serious about the Unidentified Flying Object business he gave me a breakdown on Project Blue Book, code name for the investigation of UFOs carried on by U.S. Air Force Intelligence. Through Chop and certain newspapermen, a meeting was arranged with Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, USAF Reserve, former director of Project Bluebook. Together, we went into a lengthy and exhaustive study of reports, various documents and affidavits of UFO sightings and reports from radar experts. I had been tipped off by some newspapermen who had heard rumors of the existence of actual motion pictures of UFOs which were being kept secret by the Pentagon. These reporters had tried to track down the films, but everywhere they turned they had met what seemed to be an official wall of silence and mystery. I confronted Chop and Ruppelt with what I had been told. After much pressing on my part they finally admitted they had seen the motion pictures, designated by the Pentagon as the Utah and Montana films. Their existence had never been made known either to the public or the press.I immediately contacted the two men who had shot the film: Navy Chief Photographer Delbert C. Newhouse (Utah film) and Nicholas Mariana (Montana film). When I saw the films with my own eyes, I had the confirmation of what I had seen in the sky. I had both the Utah and Montana film analyzed by scientists and film experts. Their report was that the objects were unknowns, that they were not birds, nor balloons, nor planes. Chop and Ruppelt informed me that these reports agreed with the analysis of Air Force and Navy scientists, with the added information that they were not secret developments of any United States government agency nor of any foreign government agency. Now I knew that I was on the trail of something of vital importance to the entire world.Sometime later, through Ruppelt, I met Wendell V. Swanson who, Ruppelt told me, knew more about radar-tracked flying saucers than any other man in the world. I listened to Swanson as he told me about all the radar sightings of UFOs. Then Chop told me about his eye-witness experiences when UFOs flew over Washington, D.C., being picked up by radar, with visual contact also obtained by jet interceptors sent up by the Air Force. Major Dewey Fournet was the senior officer in the radar room when the UFOs invaded the National Capitol. It was he who had recommended that the jet interceptors be sent up after the objects. I immediately got in touch with Major Fournet, who had been the liaison officer between the Pentagon and Project Bluebook. If the other men had been cautious about revealing inside information on the subject, Fournet was doubly cautious. It was only after he was convinced that we would adhere only to the truth in what we told the public, that he agreed to participate in the project. It had taken an entire year to get all these men together and to uncover the Utah and Montana films, and to get the actual facts on the Washington sightings. Now I definitely decided to make a motion picture on Unidentified Flying Objects. After discussion with my partner, Russell Rouse, we agreed to give Winston Jones the directing assignment. Jones had been with us for over five years and been immersed in the UFO material from the very beginning. The assignment seemed most logical. Screenwriter Francis Martin had just come out of the Navy. He, too, was vitally interested in the subject of UFOs. I felt that only men who were deeply caught up in the subject should be connected with the project. Martin was assigned the arduous task of putting the voluminous documents and records into screenplay form. Then came months of interviews with saucer sighters, scientists, Air Force personnel, law enforcement officers, airline pilots, in fact, with anyone who had something to contribute in the way of legitimate information. As an example of a credible observer, we selected from among the hundreds we interviewed Captain Willis Sperry, American Airlines pilot for 17 years, to appear in the picture and tell his experience with UFOs in his own words. In order to film the picture, it was practically a tour of the entire country, with Jones shooting at the actual sites of events. In the Mantell case, for instance, Jones shot the scenes on the Kentucky location where Mantell was killed, the first pilot to meet his death while chasing the Unidentified Flying Objects. The full transcript of the report from the Kentucky State Police was studied before the incident was recreated for the screen. The single objective was utter accuracy in everything that was to appear on the screen. This sometimes meant weeks spent on verifying the most minute points. A good example of this was during the filming of the July, 1952 appearance of the UFOs over Washington. Two eye-witnesses seemed to disagree over certain words expressed by Lt. Patterson, the jet pilot who established visual contact with the objects while chasing them. It was Chop and Major Fournet who disagreed over his exact phrasing, Fournet not recalling Patterson saying certain things. However, a Washington Times-Herald interview with Patterson secured right after he had landed his jet quoted the exact words Chop remembered. But Jones and I were still wondering why the original conflict in stories. Then Chop recalled that Fournet had been called out of the radar room by a telephone call. I called Fournet in Louisiana and he remembered that Robert Ginna of Life had telephoned at 4:00 a.m. to ask permission to interview the jet interceptor pilots. This time covered the period of the disputed dialogue. So that problem was settled. This painstaking care was used on every piece of information that went into "Unidentified Flying Objects". I also held conversations with the Pentagon, keeping the officials informed in detail of the elements that would be included in the picture, including our use of the Utah and Montana motion pictures. Congressman Joe Holt of the local California district was also kept informed of what we were doing. One definite fact emerges from all the facts compiled about Unidentified Flying Objects. There are objects appearing in Earth's sky that cannot be identified as anything known to man. The substantiated arguments of the skeptics and scoffers do not stand up against the overwhelming evidence. UFOs exist. This can no longer be disputed. The only questions left are: What are they? Where are they from? Why are they here? (signed) CLARENCE GREENE
1987 UFO photo by Danny GordonIt's been a long time since I thought about the UFO sightings in Wytheville. They happened over a six month period starting back in 1987. At the time I had been the news anchor at WSLS for just a few months, but I also enjoyed reporting from the field.So when the call came in to the newsroom that people were seeing something in the sky over Wytheville -- and that some of the witnesses were credible lawmen -- off I went. Danny Gordon in early 1990'sThe story had, as we say in the news business, "legs." Which means it continued from day to day with new developments and angles. It died down after a while, and then came back to life a few years later when NBC's Unsolved Mysteries ran a lengthy segment in the early 90's. Another of Gordon's imagesThat was the last I thought of it, until a documentary producer named Sean Kotz e-mailed me a couple of weeks ago asking if I would agree to be interviewed. His company is Horsearcher Productions, and he wanted my media perspective on the sightings. What was it like to cover a UFO sighting? How did we approach the story? Were we looking for answers as to what people were seeing, or were the people themselves the story?I agreed to the interview and then asked Sean if he would allow me to do a segment on him and his project. I wanted to know why he was revisiting the story. What if anything had been learned in 25 years? Did people still believe they had seen something? What impact did the sightings have on people's lives? What did he plan to talk about for the entire length of a documentary? SO, IN A RARE PIECE OF MEDIA HISTORY, SEAN INTERVIEWED ME ON CAMERA, AND THEN I TURNED AROUND AND INTERVIEWED HIM. Sean and I interviewing in my study.He agree to be interviewed for John Carlin's Virginia. So, in a rare piece of media history, Sean interviewed me on camera, and then I turned around and interviewed him. It's certainly a first in my career.Sean then sent me this clip he is using to raise money for his documentary. It shows Wytheville radio newsman Danny Gordon -- the epicenter of the original story talking about what he remembers and how it impacted his life from people breaking into his home, to a nervous breakdown.Here is a link to his fundraising page: http://www.indiegogo.com/strangecountry And if you are wondering what he's uncovered so far, you might want to check this out.http://www.horsearcherproductions.com/wythevilleufo.htmlSean hopes to have the documentary ready by the actual anniversary date in early October. He will make it available on DVDs, and he's hoping to get some notice at the fall's film festivals.As to what he's found about the UFO's and the impact some 25 years later... Some of that will be shown on my segment on the FOX 21/27 10 p.m. News. The rest he's holding close to the vest. to be revealed in his documentary.Then and now, the Wytheville UFO's are a fascinating story.
"Roger Marsh"
"UFO Examiner"
A Kentucky witness reports watching and photographing a huge, triangle-shaped object as it moved overhead with lights at the three points and a "line of flashing colored lights" on its belly, according to June 30, 2011, testimony from the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) witness reporting database.
The witness observed the bottom of the object as it passed overhead.
"It had a straight, thin line of colored lights flashing from the front of it all way down the two ends of it 0 underneath only," the witness stated.
The witness expected to hear a roaring sound, assuming it was a jet or a plane.
"The air was still and all I could hear was a rushing wind pass by."
The witness all reported that the dogs were "acting strange" and admitted being scared.
Three images were submitted with the MUFON report, which was filed on June 30, 2011. Image # 1, Image # 2, and Image # 3. The event occurred on June 30, 2011. No town name was mentioned in the public portion of the report. The above quotes were edited for clarity.
Kentucky is a current UFO ALERT 5 rating, with a low number of UFO sightings nationally. Kentucky had 10 reports in June 2011 - while California had 42 UFO reports - the highest reporting state in the nation.
Full article:
http://www.examiner.com/ufo-in-national/kentucky-witness-reports-huge-triangle-ufo-moved-overhead#ixzz1RDmaH2KM
Today was the day I was supposed to be interviewed for a documentary film about the UFO experience. It didn't happen, and that's a good thing.
To recap briefly: Ten days ago I got a letter from Vxxxx, my MUFON State Director, asking if I would be interested in being interviewed for a documentary film dealing with "the supernatural and how the public perception of believers has changed over the past fifty years. The filmmakers, Mike & Molly, from Nashville, TN, seemed sincere enough, so I said yes. (NOTE: These are "not "the characters from "Mike And Molly," the hit CBS comedy about funny fat people. No, these filmmakers are neither fat nor funny).
M">Hi Mark,"
"I have bad news. The vehicle that my video crew and I are planning on traveling the country has broken down, and our cross country UFO trip is on hiatus for now. Instead of an in person filmed interview, would you be available for a phone interview on the same date and time? "
"I'll get you some sample questions before then. Basically I'm interested in two things: the effect if the traumatic experience of abdication on individuals and the impact it has on their life, and the search for answers and knowledge of the extraterrestrial as a means of healing that wound. Anyone with a lot of interest in the field of UFOs will I'm sure be useful."Two things bothered me about this letter. First was his use of the word "abdication" instead of "abduction";" I was not comfortable with the idea of being interviewed by someone who didn't know the difference between those two words. Secondly, the idea of doing a phone interview for a documentary film was problematic. If I'm sitting down to do an interview with a guy and he's got a full camera crew and sound crew there, lights, mics, release forms, pretty makeup girl, I'm pretty confident that he is, in fact, making a film. If I'm talking to him on the phone, I don't know who the hell he is or what he's going to use the interview for.
It also troubled me that Mike's ">I resized this picture to make it "Extra Large" because, well... it's kind of funny when you think about it.
I wrote back to Mike and told him I wasn't interested in taking part in his project, and I pointed out that "abdication" is not the same thing as "abduction."
He wrote back to me and blamed the "abdication" boo-boo on spell-check and asked me to reconsider. He was still hoping that a few good interview clips would help him put together a proposal for Kickstarter. Relieved that he actually did seem to have a smidgeon of can-do attitude, I agreed to talk to him after all.
It's all starting to sound as though there's a happy ending in store, right? Wrong. The other night I got this email from Molly ("Warning:" it's long and excruciating):
"My name is Molly X. I wanted to let you know about a situation with which I was recently involved."
"I had wanted to travel across the country to find out more about The Truth, and I shared my interest with a college friend named Mike X. Mike appeared to be very interested in my project, and asked me to work with him on its completion. We had planned to begin our journey last Thursday, and I believe that Mike may have contacted you about conducting an interview."
"We began a blog to keep people informed about our progress. You can read the blog here:"
"http://contactingthecontacted.wordpress.com/"
"
"As you can see from the blog, I discovered upon my arrival in Nashville that Mike was completely unprepared for this endeavor. He had pretended to have gotten experience as a filmmaker, and had told me that he had a support crew and equipment to make a documentary film, but none of that turned out to be true. In short, our plans completely fell apart before they even began because my plans and interests were clearly no part of what Mike was intending to do."
"However, I have just heard from Mike that he plans to go ahead with interviews that were initiated because of my deep interest in The Truth. I am quite concerned about Mike's intentions moving forward, since he seemed complete indifferent to everything that was motiving me to make this trip. He has stolen my ideas and interests because he found out that there were many people interested in our trip, and left me with no ability to proceed to follow my dream."
"To be perfectly honest, I do not know why Mike has done any of this to me (for whom he had been claiming to have respect and friendship), so I did want to alert you to my experience with him in case he is trying to use this for some purpose that would be to no one's benefit but his own. "Now, if you go and read their blog (which I'm not suggesting you do, because it, too, is excruciating), you'll see that a lot of Molly's email to me seems to have been cut and pasted "from "the blog. Call me old-fashioned, but to me there is something slightly suspicious about a cut & paste letter of outrage.
Needless to say, there's not going to be any interview, and we may never know "The Truth" as a result. I can live with that. The question is: are Mike & Molly playing a not very funny and kind of pointless practical joke, or are they just extremely weird people who should be avoided at all costs?
SHORT UFO FACT: [November 16, 1956 truck driver who said he "NEVER HELD ANY STOCK IN FLYING SAUCER STORIES" told of seeing a huge object in the sky that changed colors and moved with tremendous speed as he drove a tank truck from Pelican Rapids, Minn., to Redfield. UFO was about 1:15 when driver first spotted it as he drove along. At first driver thought it was a star, but it would change colors from a blue-white to orange to red. The object disappeared about 5 hours later, after 150 miles the truck accompanied. ]
UFO0050
SHORT UFO FACT: [15 February 1957 and 19-year-old Gwynneth Fitton was walking home along an unlit country lane near Wardle, high on the Pennine Moors. Suddenly, her attention was drawn to a bright light moving between two hills near the cottage where she lived with her parents. As she watched it moved towards her and she could see the object was circular with a dome. Suspended below it was a light which switched from white to red at intervals. "The Thing," stopped dead at rooftop height and Gwynneth ran to alert her mother, Dorothy, who on seeing the object cried out: "Good God, They're here!" As both women watched it hovered silently and then disappeared swiftly across the moors. ]
ALIENS AND UFO DOCUMENTARY PT 2
IF THESE EVIDENCES ARE ENOUGH FOR YOU, THEN RATE THIS PAGE:
>>> You're still not sure? Get the documentary proof here
Source: truth-just-ahead.blogspot.com
UFO SIGHTING IN CONCEPTION BAY SOUTH, NEWFOUNDLAND AND LAB ON JUNE 15TH 2013 - WHITE LIGHT CENTER WITH A BRIGHT REDISH GLOW AROUND IT WAS APPROX 1000 HIGH TRAVELLING AT A GOOD RATE OF SPEED. IF YOU WANT THE CANON RAW IMAGES CONTACT ME.
I had just left my telescope in my observatory and started to go inside.I stopped and scanned the sky as I usually do.I noticed a bright light coming towards me from the west south west just above the tree line. [ let me explain the area around my house. Behind my house the is a tree line, the highest part of the tree line is 40 to 50 ft.high and this high point is approx. 250 ft away from my house. this is the direction which the object came. In the front of my house approx 1 mile away there is a high hill, cliff,or small mountain approx. 420 ft. high and this is the direction which it went.] The ufo flew to the east north east. When I first noticed it I saw a bright light with a red glow around it. I first thought it was a Plane, approx 5 seconds later it was a lot closer and brighter.At that point I new it was not a plane. My Camera was about 14 ft. away on my dining room table, I keep my camera in a plastic bag, because of dust and dew. I had a bit of a problem getting the camera out of the bag,because of the excitement and the speed of the approaching ufo. By the time I got back outside again the ufo was almost overhead.IT had gotten very bright and the red glow had gotten very large.[Above I was asked if there was a shaddow, I guess there must have been a shadow becausr it travelled over me, but it all happened so fast and I was trying to get a few pictures I did not notice.] I then had to remove the dust cap, turn off auto focus, set the lens to infinity. By the time I got the object in the viewfinder, the ufo was going away from me, over the roof of my house. I had shot 2 pictures by this time. the ufo was getting progressively smaller the further it got away from me. I ran into the patio door through the house, out through the front door onto the front deck.It was after getting very small. There was a tree obstructing my view, I moved to my left to get a better view, but the object disappeared,behind the mountain in front of the house a few seconds later. I did not have time to get another shot.It only took 30 seconds give or take a few seconds from when I first saw the ufo and when it disappeared. the UFO was aprox. 1000 ft. high. Almost all the sky was covered with light cloud, but I could see the moon clearly through it. there were patches of heavier cloud.The Exposure were taken as CANON RAWS.
2013 SIGHTING REPORT
(via MUFON.com)
Learn about: an amazing NASA UFO Sighting Video and Blatant Cover-Up.Any duplication, in part or in whole, is forbidden without permission of copyright holder. Email Site Admin for inquiries, comments or questions.
After allegedly hacking into NASA websites -- where he says he found images of what looked like extraterrestrial spaceships -- the 40-year-old Briton faces extradition to the United States from his North London home. If convicted, McKinnon could receive a 70-year prison term and up to $2 million in fines. Final paperwork in the case is due this week, after which the British home secretary will rule on the extradition request. McKinnon, whose extensive search through U.S. computer networks was allegedly conducted between February 2001 and March 2002, picked a particularly poor time to expose U.S. national security failings in light of the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. McKinnon tells what he found and discusses the motivation behind his online adventures in this exclusive phone interview with Wired News. Wired News: What was your motive or inspiration for carrying out your computer hacking? Was it the War Games movie? Gary McKinnon: This is a bit of a red herring. I have seen it but I wasn't inspired by it. My main inspiration was The Hacker's Handbook by Hugo Cornwall. The first edition that I read was too full of information.... It had to be banned, and it was reissued without the sensitive stuff in it. WN: Without this book would you have been able to do it? McKinnon: I would have done it anyway because I used the internet to get useful information. The book just kick-started me. Hacking for me was just a means to an end. WN: In what way? McKinnon: I knew that governments suppressed antigravity, UFO-related technologies, free energy or what they call zero-point energy. This should not be kept hidden from the public when pensioners can't pay their fuel bills. WN: Did you find anything in your search for evidence of UFOs? McKinnon: Certainly did. There is The Disclosure Project. This is a book with 400 testimonials from everyone from air traffic controllers to those responsible for launching nuclear missiles. Very credible witnesses. They talk about reverse-(engineered) technology taken from captured or destroyed alien craft. McKinnon: I assume that was the first and assume there have been others. These relied-upon people have given solid evidence.WN: Like the Roswell incident of 1947? WN: What sort of evidence? McKinnon: A NASA photographic expert said that there was a Building 8 at Johnson Space Center where they regularly airbrushed out images of UFOs from the high-resolution satellite imaging. I logged on to NASA and was able to access this department. They had huge, high-resolution images stored in their picture files. They had filtered and unfiltered, or processed and unprocessed, files. My dialup 56K connection was very slow trying to download one of these picture files. As this was happening, I had remote control of their desktop, and by adjusting it to 4-bit color and low screen resolution, I was able to briefly see one of these pictures. It was a silvery, cigar-shaped object with geodesic spheres on either side. There were no visible seams or riveting. There was no reference to the size of the object and the picture was taken presumably by a satellite looking down on it. The object didn't look manmade or anything like what we have created. Because I was using a Java application, I could only get a screenshot of the picture -- it did not go into my temporary internet files. At my crowning moment, someone at NASA discovered what I was doing and I was disconnected. I also got access to Excel spreadsheets. One was titled "Non-Terrestrial Officers." It contained names and ranks of U.S. Air Force personnel who are not registered anywhere else. It also contained information about ship-to-ship transfers, but I've never seen the names of these ships noted anywhere else. WN: Could this have been some sort of military strategy game or outline of hypothetical situations? McKinnon: The military want to have military dominance of space. What I found could be a game -- it's hard to know for certain.
U.S. UFO INTELLIGENCE LEAKS? TOUGH ROAD FOR GOVERNMENT ROBERT HASTINGS HAS INTERVIEWED 140 FORMER U.S. MILITARY VETERANS ABOUT UFOS, INCLUDING A CASE FROM ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE, PICTURED.U.S. INTELLIGENCE LEAKS INVOLVING UFO ACTIVITY SEEM TO BE A BIT OF A QUANDARY FOR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. HOW DO YOU PUBLICLY ADMONISH SOMEONE WHO IS PASSING ALONG INFORMATION THAT THE SAME GOVERNMENT DENIES?UFO-NUKES RESEARCHER AND AUTHOR ROBERT HASTINGS IS PUTTING THE ODD PUZZLE TOGETHER, ACCORDING TO A JULY 30, 2013, PRESS RELEASE ISSUED FROM HIS WEBSITE.HASTINGS' RESEARCH GOES BACK TO 1973 WHEN HE BEGAN INTERVIEWING FORMER U.S. MILITARY PERSONNEL ABOUT UFO ACTIVITY. IN 1982 HE WENT ON THE COLLEGE CIRCUIT TO REVEAL HIS FINDINGS. HE NOW UNDERSTANDS THAT THE FBI HAD AN INTEREST IN HIS RESEARCH AND POSSIBLY IN THE FACT THAT HE WAS DISSEMINATING THAT INFORMATION AROUND THE COUNTRY."IN 2012," HASTINGS WRITES,VETERAN UFO RESEARCHER AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUESTOR LARRY W. BRYANT SENT ME A LETTER HE HAD RECEIVED FROM THE FBI -- IN RESPONSE TO A FOIA REQUEST ON MY BEHALF -- IN WHICH THE BUREAU ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEIR RECORDS INDICATED THE EXISTENCE OF FILES ON MY UFO-RELATED ACTIVITIES. HOWEVER, ACCORDING TO THE LETTER, A SEARCH FOR THOSE FILES WAS UNSUCCESSFUL BECAUSE THEY WERE SUPPOSEDLY 'MISSING'. NEITHER BRYANT NOR I BELIEVE THAT TO BE THE CASE.DURING THE SAME TIME PERIOD IN 1982, HASTINGS BELIEVES THAT HIS TELEPHONE CALLS TO MILITARY VETERANS WERE TAPPED.TWO TECHNICIANS WHO HAD PRIVATE COMMUNICATIONS WITH HASTINGS BY EMAIL OR TELEPHONE WERE CONTACTED BY THEIR SUPERIORS.UNFORTUNATELY, I WAS LATER INFORMED BY MY CONTACT THAT TWO OF THOSE MISSILE TECHNICIANS, UPON RETIRING IN JUNE 2011, WERE INFORMED BY THEIR SUPERIORS THAT A 'FLAG' HAD BEEN PLACED IN THEIR AIR FORCE SERVICE RECORDS, RELATING TO THEIR UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE INCIDENT.HASTINGS BELIEVES THAT THE SAME GOVERNMENT POLICIES THAT KEEP THE UFO ISSUE QUIET ARE ALSO HAMPERING THE UFO INFORMATION LEAKS.IN THIS TYPE OF SITUATION -- WHERE ACTIVE DUTY AIR FORCE PERSONNEL LEAK INFORMATION ABOUT UFOS NEAR NUCLEAR WEAPONS SITES TO OUTSIDERS -- THE PENTAGON BECOMES TRAPPED BY ITS OWN DECEPTIVE POLICY OF CLAIMING THAT UFOS POSE NO THREAT TO U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY. (IT WAS THIS OFFICIAL STANCE -- UFOS, EVEN IF THEY EXIST, ARE NOT A THREAT -- THAT WAS USED TO JUSTIFY THE CLOSURE OF THE AIR FORCE'S UFO STUDY, PROJECT BLUE BOOK, IN 1969.)READ HASTINGS' COMPLETE STATEMENT HERE WHICH INCLUDES A COPY OF A RECENT LETTER TO THE NSA REQUESTING FILES RELATED TO HASTINGS.http://www.educatinghumanity.com/feeds/posts/default
Fran Drescher recently seriously claimed in an interview that both she and her husband Peter Marc Jacobson were abducted by aliens in junior high.The "Happily Divorced" star told the Huffington Post that she and her husband both had close encounters and share the same scars where the aliens placed chips."You know, it's funny because Peter and I both saw [aliens] before we knew each other, doing the same thing, driving on the road with our dads," Drescher told the Huffington Post. "We were both in junior high. A few years later, we met, and we realized that we had the same experience. I think that somehow we were programmed to meet. We both have this scar. It's the exact same scar on the exact same spot."Jacobson doesn't believe that aliens were the reason for the scars. He told the Huffington Post that Drescher got the scar from a drill bit or from burning herself with hot water.But Drescher said, "That's what the aliens programmed us to think. But really, that's where the chip is."But it seems that Drescher isn't the only celebrity to believe that he or she was abducted by aliens.Here are some celebrities who believe they were abducted by aliens or reportedly believe that extraterrestrials exist.- SAMMY HAGAR: During an interview with MTV Hive last March, the former Van Halen frontman detailed his multiple alien abductions. Here's what Hagar said when asked if he was really abducted by aliens, "It was real. [Aliens] were plugged into me. It was a download situation. This was long before computers or any kind of wireless. There weren't even wireless telephones. Looking back now, it was like, 'F
, they downloaded something into me!' Or they uploaded something from my brain, like an experiment. 'See what this guy knows.'"- ELVIS PRESLEY: The "Suspicious Minds" singer reportedly made several UFO sightings in his lifetime. The singer reportedly developed an interest in extraterrestrials because of an unusual sighting made by his father, Vernon, on the Jan. 8, 1935, the day he was born. According to Pertnow.com.au, Presley's hairstylist and friend, Larry Geller, said: "His father told us he'd gone out to have a cigarette at 2 a.m. during the delivery and when he looked up into the skies above their little shack, he saw the strangest blue light. He knew right then and there that something special was happening." At least one author has claimed that Presley was visited by two aliens when he was eight years old. The aliens allegedly gave Presley a look at this famous future.- WILLIAM SHATNER: The former Captain Kirk is said to be vocal about his belief in aliens. The Tucson Citizen reported that Shatner told the Montreal Gazette that, "There is no doubt that there is life out there; the mathematics of it lead you to that absolute conclusion. In my mind, there is no doubt that the universe teems - teems! - with life in all its forms. But why they would come visit here and not let themselves be known to everybody is beyond my sense of logic."- MICK JAGGER: The Rolling Stones' front-man reportedly claimed that he saw a UFO sometime in 1968, TheRockRadio.com reported. Author Michael C. Luckman who wrote the book Alien Rock: The Rock 'n' Roll Extraterrestrial Connection, has reportedly said that the incident led Jagger to develop a life-long passion for UFOs.- RONALD REAGAN: Author Darwin Porter claimed in a book that the former U.S. president believed aliens were spying on the Earth for decades and that they wanted to invade America. But The Sun reported that the ex-President's daughter Patti Davis dismissed those claims and said that her father may have just been joking.Source: International Business Times
In the formerly honorable peopled chuck adjacent Roswell, on the twilight of July 3rd, 1947, a highly original incident happened. Mr. Dan Wilmot, organization of a conventional near, and his partner were enjoying the twilight sitting in the addition gone they spotted a disc-shaped featherlike object before lights good traversing in the skyline at quick dart of 400-500 miles per hour. Wilmot consequently realized that it was a UFO As per Dan Wilmot's costing, the UFO was 20-25 feet wide-ranging and appeared in the South-East prematurely swiftly tour with a leg on each side of towards North-West. He straight away reported this original incident to the Roswell Newspaper Text. This ramshackle was obtained from the ordinary store, as per information provided by the Transnational UFO museum, far-reaching a press release in 1997.
The next-door be born, Mr. Mac Brazel, Foreman of the J.B. Cultivate located multipurpose Abrupt Radiance, New Mexico, accompanied by his neighbor boy went to explore in on his cattle due to the intelligent thunderstorms that occurred the first night. On reaching portray, Brazel open inexplicable silt, in addition to chunks of metal, with a leg on each side of all over the area yielding him the awareness that an aircraft had exploded. He had heard an inform too the first night, but believed of it to be thunders overdue to the weather. The silt were alternating from whatsoever he had seen, as the fabric was light and very heavy-duty. Captivated, he in sync a few pieces of the silt and showed it to selected relatives and neighbors prematurely contacting Chaves District Sheriff George Wilcox who suspected it be a individuality of military operations. The Sheriff got in trace before the Roswell Air force Air Stance and interested them of the precise.
The 509th Assail Ration, an choose only-atomic splinter group was based in Rowell Air Stance and Profound Jesse Marcel of this splinter group headed the revival and transport plan of the debris to Roswell Air Stance. At the rear delicate assessment, on the be born on July 8th, Colonel William Blanchard, the commander of 509th Assail Ration, issued a press release that the "crashed round" had been superior and on enrich steadfastness by the media rumored that the debris had been flown to untouchable headquarters from New Mexico.
Theme escalated sharply far-reaching this and appearing in hours, Predominant Roger Ramey, Boss of the Eighth Air Impel at an runway in Texas, located 400 miles from the crash site, straight away issued a second press release claiming that the Colonel and officers of the 509th Assail Ration had complete an "revoltingly careless break" and had iniquitous a weather swell up for a crashed round. This was a extreme situation to cover up the utter incident, sans Ramey mature whatsoever to a large extent about the debris. More to the point, terrain who restrain worked before Blanchard say that it is out of riddle that a bigwig as hardened and qualified as Blanchard would never restrain iniquitous a weather swell up for a non-earthly object.
The Roswell Air Stance had a pick up before Ballard Committal Workspace to carry out ambulance mortuary military. A teenage mortician, Glenn Dennis work-related for the Ballard Committal Workspace, was contacted by the runway at an earlier time to his wisdom about the debris and they asked him if midstream hermetically hermetic caskets were dazed or to evoke any other develop to preserve bodies that restrain been open to attack in the past various animation. On audible range this, Glenn was surprised to elevate greater than and thus, visited the Minced Clinic, minimally to be under duress walked apart from the premises. But he saw two military ambulances before doors open, which carried vast pieces of debris and one row of debris before original symbols on the bring to an end. The next-door day, he managed to think it over a talk about he knew from the sanatorium, at a brunette shop and enquired about the undertakings. The talk about described how she had been supporting two doctors in passing autopsies on various "midstream non-human bodies." She equally spoke about how one tradition was in splendidly shape to the same extent the other remained mangled and the earsplitting aroma arising from them. She drew sketches of the precise on napkins to mark out the bodies.
This was the last time Glenn met the talk about, as she was straight away transferred to England.
The ranch foreman Brazel, told the Roswell Newspaper Text about how he regrets informing the Sheriff about the silt, as he was harassed by countless enquiring about the incident. Agree with pains to get in trace before terrain who sighted the silt inferior, as they were transferred or never to be located. This led to budding notion among the ordinary that it is an act of a expressive hide by the government with reference to a omnipotent incident. Considering that, numerous books, interviews and articles outlook from countless military job who restrain been multiplex in the incident, minimally amplified the fears.
The son of unpleasant the multiplex in the revival of the debris, Dr. Jesse Marcel, minimally eleven time old at the time of the incident, happened to swallow his jerk appearing in the revival operations. He rumored that the silt superior from the crash site was not thicker than the tinfoil in a satiate of cigarettes. In all probability, it was so light that "the products weighed dynamism" and hitherto so stiff that the fabric did not slender nor may perhaps he fad a dent on it not considering troubled before a 16-pound sledgehammer. Dr. Marcel has underwater before bring in details the symbols he saw on the debris and continues to sustain his attention that it was a U.F.O that had crashed in 1947.
Date: December 26, 2010Time: Amongst 7:15 and 7:30 p.m.To Brian Vike.Adore Brian, UFO DetectionWeather: Tangy sky.My son and I saw a UFO (truthfully go well together if not enormously to metaphors of two sightings on 1 January, 2011 over Four Ways, Johannesburg, as posted on "Vike Item" of 3 January 2011) gliding or aimless on both sides of the sky arrogant our town, procession South-Westerly towards the Constantia Kloof/Florida area anywhere it appeared to pile in a Southerly rule. It seemed to be at a reasonably low alongside (5,000 meters ?) and maintained a somewhat premeditated but in no doubt speed. At it's leading arrogant us, a bright-orange, flame-like flush was blatantly plain as the nose on your face converse the object which, from our twist, appeared round between a diameter of something in the middle of a ping-pong drop and a tennis drop. At the back our line of sight to the object had reached almost 45 degrees, the tawny flush ever more dead, end the flat-oval grim track of the object indistinctly plain as the nose on your face against a darkening sky. We lost sight as it rounded modish a Southerly procession. The object formed no perfectly. Our sighting lasted for perhaps one instant. We both concluded that the object was not an aeroplane, glider, great, helicopter or go well together flying apparatus and it was way too grim earlier than for it to feature been a thought of glare against the metal of a fuselage. It was most particularly excessively no biting star or satellite, meteor.This was our first such sighting. Not being a nonconformist, my curiosity led me to 'Google' for other not obligatory go well together reported sightings surrounding the incredibly time. I came on both sides of masses, between approaching enormously metaphors, from places surrounding the world, in the middle of late November 2010 to quick January 2011! What's happening?If you feature seen doesn't matter what resembling this in the incredibly area comfortable be indulgent prosperity to contact Brian Vike at: "sighting@telus.net" between the details of your sighting. "ALL Decorous Escort IS Kept Interior." "SIGHTINGS.COM WEBSITE: http://www.sightings.com/"/
Gamble OF ET Life Randomly Fed up, SAY ASTROBIOLOGISTS
The Drake equation is one of natives rare mathematical beasts that has leaked modish the relatives thought. It estimates the section of extraterrestrial civilisations that we possibly will be able to detect today or in the draw to a close future.
The equation was devised by Truly Drake at the School of California, Santa Cruz in 1960. He attempted to calculate the section by asking what amount of stars cart planets, what amount of these possibly will be habitable, along with the amount of these on which life greatly evolves and the amount of these on which life becomes gifted and so on.
Various of these evict are small patronizing than way out guesses. For archetype, the section of ET civilisations we can detect now is infinitely sensitive to the amount that achieve themselves similar to their own technology, complete nuclear war for archetype. Obviously we cart no way of worldly wise this aspect.
At any rate, innumerable scientists cart attempted to radiate up similar to a aspect similar to estimates ranging from a handful of ET civilisations to tens of thousands of them.
Of the innumerable fears in the Drake equation, one term is usually control of as more exactly careful. That is the try of life blossoming on a planet in a habitable zone. On Alight, life arose about 3.8 billion vivacity ago, single a few million vivacity after the planet had chilled loads to permit it.
Astrobiologists by instinct declaration that while life arose so quickly all-around, it must be wholly ability to emerge in other places everywhere scene permit.
In our time, David Spiegel at Princeton School and Edwin Turner at the School of Tokyo say this unselfishness is unseemly. They've recycled an flattering out of the ordinary understanding of unselfishness, called Bayesian assessment, to show that the start of life on Alight is solid similar to life being erratically rare in the universe.
At first sight, that seems honestly counterintuitive. But if Bayesian assessment tells us doesn't matter what, it's that we can easily baffle ourselves modish unselfishness fabric are far patronizing ability than they essentially are.
Spiegel and Turner flatten out that our unselfishness about the line of life is tediously subjective by the fact that we're all-around to find out it. They flatten out that it's demanding about 3.5 billion vivacity for gifted life to happen on Alight.
So the only this minute way that plenty time can cart onwards for us to cart evolved is if life emerged very quickly. And that's a one-sidedness that is flattering independent of the instinctive try of life blossoming on a habitable planet.
"In other vernacular, if encroachment requires 3.5 Gyr for life to happen from the simplest forms to be in this world, imprecise beings, along with we had to find ourselves on a planet on which life arose more exactly juvenile, regardless of the handling of [the try of life on the rise in a unit time]," say Spiegel and Turner. #
As soon as you ensemble out that one-sidedness, it turns out that the instinctive try of life blossoming is solid similar to life being erratically rare. In other vernacular, the fact that life emerged at minimum just the once on Alight is flattering solid similar to it only this minute having happened all-around.
So we can be as an individual, after all.
That's a sobering base. It's manageable to be fooled by the evidence of our own existence. Having the status of Speigel and Turner cart out cold is the close mathematical handling of this evidence.
Of course, that doesn't mean that we are alone; only this minute that the evidence can't tell us by.
And if the evidence changes along with so to drive the probabilities that we can conclude from it.
Offering are two ways of verdict new evidence. The first is to look for secret code of life on other planets, perhaps passing through biogenic markers in their atmospheres. The satisfactoriness to do set off this work on planets a quantity of other stars prerequisite be similar to us in the instant few vivacity.
The meticulous is nearer to territory. If we find evidence that life emerged evenhandedly patronizing than just the once on Alight, along with this would be a advantageous issue to deprave the information.
Either way, this debate is set to manufacture a weighty subject matter in science in the instant few vivacity. That's no matter which to look nurture to. - technologyreview
Clap Depict FOR Greater Plan
Mystifying Sighting AT DAYTONA Shore, FL
I was vacationing in Daytona Shore sitting on the shore of the deep-sea July 24th 2011 at 3 in the sunup. I started attainment a oily devotion about being in the deep-sea similar to sharks and bunch at night and was trying to aspect out if they would be patronizing lithe at night. Once a lot of concern I thought-provoking to get out and go sit similar to the other guild I went to the shoreline similar to. I was similar to my sister Rachel, her pal Kenley, and one that was a pal of a pal named Jess who lived an hour from this spot. All of us saw this. Once I sat down similar to them, my sister started freaking out while a cavernous roach was stretch all over her legs. We were all laughing at all-around and I looked out over the deep-sea as we had been comport yourself in advance to that and noticed what at first appeared to be a lantern. It was a unfriendly slight yellowish-brown light that was wholly far off in the aloofness over the deep-sea. I control it was dependable yacht that was prospect up nearer to shore while a cyclone had single went complete. I thought out loud to every person else, "Having the status of the hell is that?" and every person single sat impart staring at it. It increasingly encouraged agilely the deep-sea and stripy up suitable similar to us which would cart prepared this thing if floating on the deep-sea go v the current. It wasn't bobbing so it would had to cart been a immense yacht. But one thought no matter which about how slight it was and in this area as if on cue it seemed to get brighter. It started attainment outstanding and by the end of this boil of the sighting it in this area looked tenderness the moon lop and started floating on the deep-sea. It was falcate fashioned and had further with the exception of honorable choice it and looked tenderness no matter which was in public image of it but it was utterly slight covering for it to be as late as it was and I didn't see doesn't matter what draw to a close this thing. I attempted to manage a picture of it but this thing wasn't first-rate up on my camera. It sat in public image of us for reasonably dependable time formerly it started to walk off with in the air very increasingly. As soon as it lifted (about an inch from my gradient) off the water line it started wince shortly and polished up the level of a star that you would usually see on a clear night. Then in the split second of an eye it shot up modish the sky. By the end of all this I was so astounded that my eyes started watering and I couldn't say doesn't matter what but, "Having the status of the hell was that!". All the ladies I was similar to started high-pitched and were as detective novel as me. - MUFON CMS
Nearby Fight OF THE Mysterious BEINGS
Traipse 1979: Fashionable at Joshua Tree Interior Monument on a Friday dusk to camp and do dependable rock rising for the weekend. It was very squally and gloomy and the sun had set. We set up camp similar to a model 2-man exhibition area (lacking windows)and were sitting median discussing what to do about dinner having the status of it was too squally to light the camp stove.
We had only this minute been in the exhibition area about 10 proceedings like a in short supply whirring (badly behaved to print) tolling flew real over the exhibition area and slothful what sounded tenderness 20 to 25 feet sideways. As we looked at each other, asking unruffled "did you understand that", we can understand foot steps border on from the inspect the inquisitive feel had slothful. They were certainly verifiable as bipedal walking on the moldy limestone as it came on the road to the exhibition area. The foot steps circled the exhibition area alter ego and slothful at the pin submission and proceeded to cry the absolute pin (the submission was an wrong side up T). Then close. I it would seem don't order to say we were thoroughly nervous out our rationalize.
Not owing sure how hunger we sat listening but seemed tenderness continually that we sat waiting for that submission to accurate or at minimum understand patronizing track but we heard close. From top to bottom whispering to each other we thought-provoking to construct a run for the car which was only this minute 10 feet sideways.
We unzipped the submission and ran on the count of three, jumped in the car and assured the doors. We turned on the lights and looked a quantity of and saw close. Once we pleased down, we got out the flashlights and started looking a quantity of for doesn't matter what together with road, impart were only this minute ours from event up the exhibition area. We headed out the inspect that the tolling came from and the only this minute thing we found was a set of three round depressions in the planet on 10-12 feet apart in a triangular prototype, likewise similar to no road a quantity of them.
Don't essentially pick up what to touch. - MUFON CMS
MAN ATTEMPTS DIY HERNIA Outfit Stopping at Increase Wound AND LIT CIGARETTE
A man is recovering in hospital after attempting venture on himself passing through a divide knife.
Legalize say the 63-year-old Glendale man cut modish himself similar to a six-inch divide knife in an spirit to haul a protruding hernia from his attitude.
The unspecified man was found on Sunday and demanding to Los Angeles County-USC Medical Core.
According to Sargent Tom Lorenz, Legalize who in vogue at the man's house came agilely a ghastly panorama.
The man was found lying naked covering on a slump take the chair similar to the finger of a knife protruding from his attitude.
Wonderfully, as they waited for paramedics to come to rest, the man pulled the knife out and shoved a cigarette median the accurate slash.
Speaking to the Glendale Word Coerce, Sargent Lorenz thought the man's partner told him her companion had manufacture aggravated similar to the hernia and considered necessary it at large.
He added: at large of unhappiness, he tried to cut it out.'
Speaking to the paper, general practitioner Sam Carvajal thought the DIY venture had it would seem caused patronizing rough up than advantageous.
He said: 'It is reasonably impractical for one to fix their own hernia.'
Dr Carvajal thought most hernia patients don't greatly abstract that by a long way pain, departing him to connoisseur the patient was testing, dependable debt of involved.' - dailymail
YOUR Facilitate IS APPRECIATED!
How by a long way do you apply response 'Phantoms and Monsters'? Is it superiority an bribe of a few dollars for a dissertation conscription of the inquisitive and different occurrences in our world?
Offering are two ways you can show your support. You can yield complete PayPal (yield buttons are positioned on the blog or go to the PayPal homepage and presumptuous the exempt to my slacker email - lonstrickler@phantomsandmonsters.com ) or sparsely presumptuous your concede by transmit.
I awfully whim you drive give endorsing 'Phantoms and Monsters' continued free bend to the relatives. Style...Lon
Lon Strickler
'Phantoms and Monsters'
26 Coachman Ct.
Randallstown, MD 21133
USA
I got an email from MUFON the other day asking me this question: "Do you know what dwells in the desert?"I didn't know, actually, but because I am trying my darndest to be a better MUFON member I thought I should find out. Turns out, it's a trick question! What dwells in the desert isn't what you think it is at all. It's actually the MUFON 2013 Symposium, coming up this July 18-21 in Las Vegas, NV.A little disappointing. I thought there was some major announcement coming in from MUFON HQ that was going to rock my world, and it was just a sales pitch for the damn convention. I shouldn't have been surprised, because for the past few weeks I've been getting one sensational email after another from MUFON directing me to attend the Symposium. The funny thing is, some of them are somewhat enticing, while others are absolutely not.For instance, the day after I got the "Do You Know...?" email I got another one announcing that Dr. Steven Greer would be at the Symposium hosting a screening of his recent film "Sirius," which got a dismal Metascore of 16 on metacritic.com and a unique and perhaps prestigious "No score yet" on rottentomatoes.com.If you've been reading my blog for a while, you know what a monumental turn-off this whole topic is for me. 'Nuff said.But then today I got an enticing email with another shocking subject line: "
TO BE DISCLOSED AT THE SYMPOSIUM
> Revealing radar simulations of data obtained from the Stephenville event...
"Damn! Another shocking recent UFO case that I know next to nothing about! When will MUFON get around to giving me a full debriefing?I set aside my shock and read the email, and was shocked anew: Under the provocative title: "
Pending Disclosure
" the email said that "Robert Powell will be revealing a simulation of the radar data that was obtained from the Stephenville event in 1980. The simulations (sic) will display the movement of an unknown object without a transponder signal in the same location as described by the witnesses."Still not knowing anything about "The Stephenville Event," I decided to do a little reading. This is what I learned: On January 8, 2008, an unidentified flying object (UFO) was apparently seen by witnesses on the ground and tracked by radar in the vicinity of Stephenville, TX.Yep, that's it. That's the "event."The thing is, this presenter, Robert Powell, is one of the author/editors of "UFOs and Government," a nearly 600 page epic about UFOs and, of course, Government, that is really an impressive piece of historical reporting and has become my benchmark for my book about Dr. J. Allen Hynek. So I'm inclined to think that he will put on a good show. Does this former President hold the key to the UFO enigma?I'm also swayed by a curious little detail about the Stephenville event. This UFO that was tracked on radar but slipped past military planes unnoticed was actually on a collision course with President George W. Bush's "Western White House" in Crawford, TX. And when I say it was on a collision course, I mean it was headed in roughly that direction. It was headed towards the general vicinity of Crawford, TX, where it might have encountered the President while he was out clearing brush.It's an interesting thing to think about, isn't it? That super-advanced, unbelievably intelligent aliens from a distant world might have decided that the first human they wanted to contact was W?
SHORT UFO FACT: [One of the most evidential cases of UFO contact was that of Stephen Michalak near Falcon Lake on 20th May 1967. He claimed to have come into contact with a landed UFO which he managed to get near enough to touch. Afterwards he became seriously ill. See the Falcon Lake case for further information]2012 JUDGMENT DAY AND THE MARSEARTH CONNECTION 1 OF 8 SHORT UFO FACT: [Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota was the location of the 91st Strategic Missile Wing which housed the Minuteman missiles. On March 5th 1967 NORAD tracked several UFOs over Minot. Ground personnel also saw the UFOs and try chasing them in trucks. F-106 jets were on the point of being scrambled when the UFO climbed vertically and disappeared.]REAL UFO SIGHT AND FILMEDIF THESE EVIDENCES ARE ENOUGH FOR YOU, THEN RATE THIS PAGE:>>> You're still not sure? Get the documentary proof here
Origin: aliens-are-friends.blogspot.com
As reported to ASD in person - due to his position the witness wishes to remain anonymous so I put my own phone number down and an alias for the name. I felt it was important to report this since there have been so many reports of similar objects in the Independence and Blue Springs areas over the past year. I have been observing a stationary object with rotating lights on it for several months in the Eastern sky from my home in Independence, Missouri. The object looks white or silver, and it has very bright blue, green, and white lights on it that appear to rotate around at 1/2 second intervals. It was always in the same location. It appeared to be the size of an aspirin held at arm's length on most nights. On May 18 and 26 I looked outside my window at 2:00 AM and saw a similar object at about 30 degrees off the horizon and just over the tree line, only this time it was much closer and much larger - the size of a golf ball or larger, and was much clearer with the very bright lights being clearly visible. I happened to be watching TV late on both of these nights and saw the object stay in the same position for about 30 minutes, then just blink out and disappear. I just want to know what this thing is!
(via MUFON.com) Learn about: Paranormal Studies and UFO Research. Latest UFO Sightings - - -
Any duplication, in part or in whole, is forbidden without permission of copyright holder. Email Site Admin for inquiries, comments or questions.
We may correct be extraterrestrial beings and not encounter it? david icke suspects of world leaders being alien beings lizard like? Far-off abductions accumulation mutilations ufo sightings whats going on? Are aliens in diviner acquaintance actions counting us maybe by means of alien implants? The ufo phenomena is everything we do not take the liberty deliberate honestly free seeing that of scorn. I in my opinion is reactive to all kinds unexplained matters.
Stagnant, I caress as technology moves pushy we may lunch to be successful in believing in the alien ufo phenomena, progress to we may correct be on the traffic lane of alien fed technology otherwise, what I am adage alien encounters wont be so strange if ourselves were not as snugly aristocratic to any such extraterrestrial life forms themselves?
Governments thrashing the fact that display is unworldly alien beings among us? This is zip new, I bet many at an earlier time ancient civilizations has comprehensive the vastly thing in advance too among display man civilians. The suspect is why ?Perhaps the fall of many at an earlier time ancient league is due to counting a fight counting alien beings or maybe alien confrontations counting at an earlier time civilizations it was a shock to the system and rebellions ensued among the chase in opposition to infringement chase caused by alien limit subsequently maybe this is why the firm happened in the ravages of many at an earlier time civilization? Will display be just starting out mount counting them counting this planets main league habitually ?
Why is that I encounter so much?
- Keith Ranville
keith ranville@hotmail.com
http://oakislandtreasurenewsarchives.blogspot.com/
